Tag Archives: Democrat

The Democrat 2020 Totem-pole

I think Elizabeth Warren (Figure 1) is massively afraid of being upstaged on the diversity totem pole by Oprah (Figure 2) in the 2020 Democrat primary. (heh… totem pole) She is afraid that she will lose all political oxygen like the regular GOP candidates did… Since the diversity and progress cultists require ever renewed highs, (like addicts) I think Oprah would be formidable or even unbeatable in the Democrat 2020 primary. See, I think part of Hillary’s problem was that she wasn’t a step up the totem pole from Obama. Going from a black President to a white one is unacceptably regressive for Democrats. Oprah, being black and female, has more diversity points even than Obama, and therefore represents ‘progress’. (Eventually anyone who isn’t minority, female, LGBTetc, and diagnosed with PTSD will be unacceptable to democrats as they will be regressive…) Since the majority of the Democrats in power are white and/or male, I expect the Dems to launch preemptive strikes to keep Oprah out of the 2020 business. And Warren leads the way:

“I don’t know” if America is ready for another celebrity billionaire president, she said. “Here’s what I do know. We are right now in the middle of fights that will determine our future for generations to come.”

Figure 1: ‘Native American’

170px-Elizabeth_Warren_CFPB

Figure 2: ‘Cares about Sexual Harassment’

gettyimages-463593775

 

Oh… look at that a few preliminary preemptive strikes…

www.washingtonpost.com

www.reviewjournal.com/opinion

www.chicagotribune.com

 

 

Advertisements

A Theory on American Voters

At this point, despite the fact that he is clearly not a Republican, Trump appears to be set to win the nomination for the Republican party.  So I’d like to propose a theory, sort of a unified theory of American voting. That is, that American voters belong to three parties… but we only have two parties to choose from. (Perhaps due to the constant, and idiotic, political binary of right-left-center.) The three actual parties are socialist, populist and small-r republican. But what we have are the Democratic and the Republican parties.

I suspect that roughly 1/4 -1/3 of both the Republicans and the Democrats are actually populists. And Trump is the ‘Populist party’ nominee. This would explain how he manages to get roughly a third of the primary vote every single time.

To push this further, I think that the populists in the country, not having any party apparatus through which to express their political desires, generally gravitate to belonging to whatever party, Democrat or Republican, that runs a given state if that party is dominant enough. So, for example, in Alabama, where the Democrats are becoming an endangered species, the populists (roughly 33% of the electorate) vote something like 80/20 republican/democrat. But in New York state, the populists vote roughly 80/20 democrat/republican. This isn’t just a cynical ploy on their part. Anyone who would be a ‘Populist party’ politician at the state level would have to run and get elected in the dominant party.

If we did actually have a populist party, we might have states that are ~40% republican, and about 25-30% each democrat and populist (like maybe Texas) and some other states with ~40% democrat and the other split (like maybe Pennsylvania) and some that are run by the populist party… Not sure if this would disproportionally harm either the Republican party or the Democrat party since I suspect that every state has at least 20% populists…

Anyway, the main problem (other than the 20-?% of the country that are socialists) is that while our country has voters for a Leftist party, a populist party and a republican (small r again) party, we are governed by a small cadre of senators and representatives and bureaucrats who are in their own little, powerful and power-hungry ‘globalist party’…

Anyway, its a theory and it isn’t a conspiracy, which already puts it far above the general fever-swamps of Internet theories…